Navigation - US HomeNavigation - WorldwideNavigation - ContactNavigation - Site Map
  Logical Images

 

Products :
grey divider
Overview
grey divider
graphic grey arrow down VisualDx
graphic blue arrow rightHow It Works
graphic blue arrow rightTrusted Content
graphic blue arrow rightProven
graphic blue arrow rightSuccess Stories
graphic blue arrow rightSystem Requirements
graphic blue arrow rightFree Trial
graphic blue arrow rightPurchase - Institution
graphic blue arrow rightPurchase - Individual
grey divider
VisualDx Dental
grey divider
Smallpox Vaccination
grey divider
Visual Knowledge
Management
grey divider
Photo of clinicians discussing VisualDx
 
Center for Future Health. University of Rocehster. Rochester, NY. Study Highlights

Objective
The objective of the study was to assess physician diagnostic accuracy when using a visual decision support tool in comparison to reference textbooks to solve four "unknown" cases.

grey divider

Methodology
Four case presentations were obtained from the medical literature that were found to have pictures in the reference text, and were of sufficient difficulty to require a physician to seek reference in "solving" the case.

A mix of 50 emergency, internal medicine, family medicine and dermatologist physicians participated.

First, training was provided using a five-minute script to demonstrate the basic VisualDx software functionality. Each case synopsis was presented on a single uniform placard with images. The subject used either the textbooks or the VisualDx software for assistance, and then provided their 1st, 2nd, and 3rd diagnostic choices.

grey divider

Conclusion
The comparison to text-based resources modeled clinical practice today, as physicians frequently reach for atlases or texts containing pictures to assist visual diagnostic evaluations. The resulting data significantly suggests advantages to using VisualDx over traditional text based resources.

 

 
graphic orange arrow right Scientifically proven to improve diagnostic accuracy 124% after 5 minutes of instruction
Generalist physicians and dermatologists participated in a randomized trial to assess diagnostic accuracy when using a visual decision support tool in comparison to reference textbooks.

The study was conducted by the Center for Future Health at the University of Rochester and the results were published in a poster presented at the AMIA 2001 Annual Symposium.

Specific conclusions:
  • Correct diagnoses improved by 124% among the non-dermatologists
  • The results were statistically significant
  • Minimal training was required to effectively use the tool
  • Physicians subjectively preferred VisualDx to textbooks

View full report (369K)

   
 

 

   
 

 


 

© 2007 Logical Images. All rights reserved